Offences cannot be relegated as public order and different laws may prohibit assignment in certain cases.  In addition, the (second) reformulation of the contracts lists the prohibitions in Article 317(2)(a), which are based on the effect on the unrested party (debtor) , with similar prohibitions in the Single Commercial Code §2-210.  For example, UZK § 2-210 provides that: The present study offers the teaching of intellectual creation law new perspectives for studying the institution of termination of the assignment contract for persons from the intellectual creation creation of economic rights. We believe that this study is rich in contributions to teaching, formulates new theses and opens the perspective of new perspectives of scientific research. Last but not least, we appreciate that the proposals made in this study contribute not only to the action of opinion influences in this area, but also to the work of practitioners and direct beneficiaries of the legal provisions on the transfer of authors` property rights. Equipment leases generally contain a language that prohibits the lessee from assigning the lease to a third party. For example, “you do not have the right to sell, transfer, assign, sublet or weigh in on the equipment or this agreement” protects the owner`s warranty and credit coverage policies in the event that the lessee wishes to one day transfer the lease agreement to another party. However, it is possible to transfer the lease, but the new party (assignee) is subject to the credit quality verification process and the approval of the lessor. Even if the assignee is authorized, the personal guarantees of the existing lessee (Zdners), if any, may not be released unless the solvency of the assignee is extremely strong.
Unless otherwise agreed, all rights of the seller or buyer may be assigned, unless the assignment materially alters the obligation of the other party, significantly increases the burden or risk imposed on it by its contract or significantly affects its chance of performance. A right to compensation for breach of the entire contract or a right arising from the performance of its entire commitment by the assignor may be assigned despite other agreements [sic]. A person may also assign his or her rights to receive benefits due to a partner in partnership. However, this does not allow the secession party to obtain human rights with regard to the functioning of the partnership. The transferee must not vote on partnership matters, consult partnership books or take possession of ownership of the partnership; on the contrary, the transferee may only be granted the right to recover distributions of income, unless the other partners agree to the transfer of a new supplement with operational, management and financial interests. . . .